We fine-tune open-weight models on your real work, connect them through BackContext, and keep them improving. Frontier-level accuracy on your tasks, at a fraction of the cost.



Work records captured
Average task accuracy
Lower cost per task
BackContext records every task your team and agents complete, and links it to what actually happened
Verified outcomes become training data. We fine-tune an open model and benchmark it against Opus 5.5, Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra
It ships behind a quality gate with frontier fallback. Every new outcome makes the next version better
Every engagement starts with one question: can a model trained on your work beat the best frontier model at your task, for less?
97.4% on held-out evals, ahead of Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra

$1.40 per 1,000 tasks, against $65 on GPT-6 Astra

Deploy in your own VPC. No per-token bill, no lock-in
Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and any MCP client, through BackContext

Every verified outcome becomes training data for the next version

Is a fine-tuned open model really as good as Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Astra?
On the narrow tasks you run every day, it’s usually better. Our production models average 97.4% on held-out customer evals, against 91.8–93.1% for frontier models on the same tasks. We show you the comparison on your own data before you switch.
How much data do we need?
Usually a few thousand verified examples per task. BackContext captures them from the work your team and agents already do, so most customers have enough within weeks.
Where does the model run?
In your AWS, GCP or Azure account, inside your VPC, or on Applied Crew–managed inference. The weights are yours either way.
What happens to our data?
It trains your models and nothing else. It is never pooled with other customers, never used to train shared models, and encrypted at rest.
How long until our first model is in production?
Typically four to six weeks: two weeks of recording with BackContext, two weeks of training and evals, then a staged rollout behind a quality gate.